Buying a second lettings agency: repeating the clawback structure in Durham
The same buyer's second acquisition in two months: a Durham agency bought by asset purchase with seller finance and a landlord-retention clawback
By Malcolm ZoppiProperty
Key facts
- Deal type
- Asset purchase
- Acting for
- Buyer (established lettings agent)
- Business
- Lettings agency, Durham
- Sector
- Property
- Deal value
- Low six figures
- Structure
- Asset purchase; part cash, part seller-financed; clawback if landlords leave within an agreed period
- Timescale
- Completed a month after the same buyer's first acquisition
- Completed
- May 2025
- Lead solicitor
- Malcolm Zoppi
At a glance
A month after buying a lettings agency in Cambridge, the same client bought a second, larger agency in Durham. We used the same structure: an asset purchase paid partly in cash and partly through seller finance, with a clawback requiring the seller to repay part of the price if landlords left within an agreed period. The deal, in the low six figures, completed in May 2025.
The client and the objective
The client was growing by acquisition and wanted a repeatable way to do it. Having agreed the structure once, the aim was to apply it again quickly and consistently, adjusting only for the size of the agency and what was particular to it.
The deal
- Asset purchase of the agency's business: landlord contracts, goodwill and the related assets.
- Price paid partly in cash on completion and partly by seller finance over time.
- A clawback under which the seller repays part of the price if landlords leave within an agreed period.
Key legal issues and how we solved them
Reusing a structure without copying it blindly
A second deal on the same model is quicker and cheaper, but every agency is different. We started from the documents agreed on the first acquisition and reviewed each provision against this agency: its landlord contracts, its size and the seller's position.
A larger book, a larger risk
With a bigger landlord book and a higher price, the clawback mattered more. The definitions of which landlords count, what counts as leaving and how repayments are calculated were checked against the actual book so that the protection worked in practice.
Two integrations at once
Taking on two agencies within weeks meant two sets of landlords being told about the change at the same time. The agreement set out how the handover would be communicated and what the seller would do to support it.
Outcome
The acquisition completed in May 2025, a month after the first, giving the client two new locations and a structure it can use again.
What this deal shows
- Once a deal structure works, it can be reused, but each provision should be checked against the new target.
- The bigger the landlord book, the more the clawback definitions matter.
- A buyer with a repeatable structure can move quickly when the next opportunity comes up.
“The second deal took a fraction of the time of the first because the structure was already agreed. We still checked every clause against the new agency, because no two landlord books are the same.”